News – Uinta Basin PVT Study
Uinta Basin – Multi-Client PVT Study
29 December 2023
Last updated: 29 December 2023
Uinta Basin – Multi-Client Study
The Uinta-basin multi-client project was first initiated in 2023. The main objective of the study was to create one, field-wide equation of state (EOS) model for the entire Uinta-basin. Since then, more data has been incorporated into the model, resulting in a more robust thermodynamic description.
But what is a field-wide EOS model? In simple terms, you can think of it as a field-wide “PVT correlation” applicable for all fluids in a given basin (black oils | volatile oils | near-critical fluids | gas condensates | wet gases | dry gases). The model is tuned/adjusted to measured PVT laboratory data available in that particular basin and can be used to consistently predict PVT data such as saturation pressures, formation volume factors (FVF), solution GORs/CGRs, densities, compressibilities, and viscosities across a field. Here is some key information about the study.
Uinta Basin – Multi-Client Study
The Uinta-basin multi-client project was first initiated in 2023. The main objective of the study was to create one, field-wide equation of state (EOS) model for the entire Uinta-basin. Since then, more data has been incorporated into the model, resulting in a more robust thermodynamic description.
But what is a field-wide EOS model? In simple terms, you can think of it as a field-wide “PVT correlation” applicable for all fluids in a given basin (black oils | volatile oils | near-critical fluids | gas condensates | wet gases | dry gases). The model is tuned/adjusted to measured PVT laboratory data available in that particular basin and can be used to consistently predict PVT data such as saturation pressures, formation volume factors (FVF), solution GORs/CGRs, densities, compressibilities, and viscosities across a field. Here is some key information about the study.
Number of PVT Samples
In this study, PVT samples from 11 different well locations ranging from the separator to bottomhole fluid sampling were included in the EOS model development work. The production comes from Castle Peak, Uteland Butte, Wasatch and Black Shale formations, with separator GOR ranging from 375 to 1,150 scf/sep. bbl and API ranging from 37 to 45.
Experimental Overview
The table above summarizes PVT experiments performed on all samples.
Participating Companies
Unconventional Fluids Systems
Unconventional fluid systems demonstrate strong field-wide PVT consistency although the reservoir fluid (i.e. composition) varies significantly. Reservoir fluid differences are dominantly determined by thermal maturity, which is the main reason behind the consistent fluid characteristics over large areas. What this means in practice, is that we can use one fluid model (i.e. EOS model) for the entire field, but what changes from area-to-area/well-to-well is the GOR (i.e. composition). This has been one of the key findings in all our studies.
Which Unconventional Basins Have We Conducted This Type of Work?
United States
Consortium Budget
The participation budget is 40,000 USD per company.
Want to know more? Send an e-mail to carlsen@whitson.com
In this study, PVT samples from 11 different well locations ranging from the separator to bottomhole fluid sampling were included in the EOS model development work. The production comes from Castle Peak, Uteland Butte, Wasatch and Black Shale formations, with separator GOR ranging from 375 to 1,150 scf/sep. bbl and API ranging from 37 to 45.
Experimental Overview
Experiments | # |
CCE | 12 |
Swelling Test | 1 |
DLE | 11 |
Separator Test | 7 |
Oil Viscosity | 13 |
Participating Companies
- Ovintiv
- Javelin
- Finley Resources / Uinta Wax
Unconventional Fluids Systems
Unconventional fluid systems demonstrate strong field-wide PVT consistency although the reservoir fluid (i.e. composition) varies significantly. Reservoir fluid differences are dominantly determined by thermal maturity, which is the main reason behind the consistent fluid characteristics over large areas. What this means in practice, is that we can use one fluid model (i.e. EOS model) for the entire field, but what changes from area-to-area/well-to-well is the GOR (i.e. composition). This has been one of the key findings in all our studies.
Which Unconventional Basins Have We Conducted This Type of Work?
United States
- Eagle Ford / Austin Chalk – Texas (Multi client)
- Permian (Midland & Delaware) – Texas & New Mexico (Multi client)
- Anadarko Basin (SCOOP/STACK/Merge) – Oklahoma (Multi client)
- Bakken – North Dakota (Multi client)
- Powder River – Wyoming & Montana (Multi client)
- Uinta Basin – Utah / Colorado (Multi client)
- Utica Basin – Pennsylvania (Single client)
- Arkoma Basin – Oklahoma (Single client)
- Montney, Alberta & British Columbia (Multi client)
- Duvernay, Alberta (Multi client)
- Garrington, Alberta (Single client)
- Jafurah basin, Saudi Arabia (Single client)
- Vaca Muerta, Argentina (Single client)
Consortium Budget
The participation budget is 40,000 USD per company.
Want to know more? Send an e-mail to carlsen@whitson.com